nanaxdx.blogg.se

1. #Jar2exe tutorial how to
2. #Jar2exe tutorial .exe
3. #Jar2exe tutorial software
4. #Jar2exe tutorial free
5. #Jar2exe tutorial windows

When you write a Java Callout, you may want to do custom error handling in your Java code.

#Jar2exe tutorial how to

If you're new to Java callouts, we recommend that you start with How to create a JavaĬallout. I've been thinking about something like that before, but i'm not certain how to create such exe (seems googling isn't helping me much here) - any help would be greatly appreciated.You're viewing Apigee Edge documentation. Not only is this the easiest way, but its also the most common one I've seen used. That certainly is truth as well, there is nothing to discuss.

#Jar2exe tutorial windows

I'm fully aware of that, however in my opinion that's not decision you are making when the application is already written and you're looking for way how to most easily distribute it on windows (not even talking now about any specific issues like crossplatform problems which c++ has.) Whether they find such a solution "easier" because it "just works" is, often times, just a measure of how casually they approach that additional responsibility.

#Jar2exe tutorial software

(In the case of Windows, how they should check or create the right associations so that the bahaviour and iconic representation of their app and its data files is as they want it.)Īny programmer who decides to use "wrapper" software to deploy their cross platform square shaped Java app in the round hole of some particular platform has the additional responsibility of ensuring that the wrapper software doesn't actually break their app. The programmer should put in the effort to understand how things should be set up in the platforms they intend to deploy on. I would add that providing some such mechanism is the programmer's responsibility and should not involve cryptic "readme" instructions imposed on the end user. So a reasonable response is to focus on Y, rather than X, and ask whether it's the right tool for the job.įortunately the platform specific part (ie launching a Java app) can be accomplished using web start, or by a very brief "batch" file appropriate to the platform. To help you understand, realise that often questions of the form "How do I do X in language Y?" fail to fully consider that technologies are better fitted to some tasks than to others. I don't know if it's offtopic, but it's late.

#Jar2exe tutorial .exe

exe that the only purpose is to open the. Heres another solution(stupid but it works), make a. exe is the best ideia as long as the conversion does not corrupt the classes, i believe paid solution are the only thing i would personally risk. exe, so maybe people could learn how to use it. jar might also help, i mean it is also a double click, the same as. though i realized that maybe writing a README. I couldn't agree with you more my friend.

I also think that creating batch file for loading Jar is certainly not today's most elegant way to run it - as we all know they're still included only for backwards compability in windows today. You should understand that the most common user of windows is almost unable to do even things like setting jars to be automatically opened - and i guess that's psychok7s point. Xlinuks I strongly recommend you to just stay quiet when you can't help, instead of teaching everyone about unrelated things - or is this some kind of way you are trying to point on yourself? What the heck is this?! How is it related to original question?! jar files are not what you wish - then stop programming Java and do C++. I really can't understand, why every second reply here is filled with crap like this: Some windows only tool so i didn't bother trying it.

#Jar2exe tutorial free

However the free version shows some kind of ad before created exe starts.

jar file and 2nd as complete copy of the application).

It looks quite good and it's capable of building exe file in two ways (as somewhat similar to link, that points to. I've been lately looking for exact same thing as psychok7. Higher-level languages save you a lot of frustrations, very much save your time, and make you a better programmer, that is, a better thinker about problems. In my humble opinion I draw the opposite conclusions from this. Will save you a lot of future frustrations, save your time, and make you a better programmer with a brighter future.

But those requirements do not pop up as often as one might imagine. if you want to program on Windows, C# is probably the better and future-proof option.įor the genuine low level requirements, C is great. I do disagree strongly with xlinuks' assertion about having to learn C++ though, it's a nasty language. on Linux we of course have everything covered by package managers. Java does need an InstallShield style installer that manages dependencies though. jars with a defined main method is the way to go really.